Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#26629 - [libassuan] missing check() support
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Jason William Walton (jasonww) - Wednesday, 26 October 2011, 09:15 GMT
Last edited by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) - Thursday, 12 January 2012, 16:36 GMT
Opened by Jason William Walton (jasonww) - Wednesday, 26 October 2011, 09:15 GMT
Last edited by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) - Thursday, 12 January 2012, 16:36 GMT
|
DetailsSteps to reproduce:
No testsuite is run during packaging. Additional that may or may not be relevant: Package does not use package() Package is not signed by packager. Package is built with old toolchain. Upstream has signature available for inclusion in source array. |
This task depends upon
Comment by Jelle van der Waa (jelly) -
Friday, 28 October 2011, 14:43 GMT
Its not unusual that this package doesnt use signing or doesnt use a signed source isn't strange. Since it's not even officialy supported.
Comment by Jason William Walton (jasonww) -
Saturday, 29 October 2011, 18:08 GMT
Was merely a hint for the maintainer to add those and consider bumping the PKGREL while he's at it. Given that it's part of the gnupg dependency chain that's not too far fetched imho.