AUR web interface

Tasklist

FS#2576 - Fields spacing request.

Attached to Project: AUR web interface
Opened by eliott (cactus) - Thursday, 14 April 2005, 23:20 GMT
Last edited by Simo Leone (neotuli) - Monday, 18 April 2005, 03:25 GMT
Task Type Feature Request
Category Backend
Status Closed
Assigned To Simo Leone (neotuli)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 1.0
Due in Version 1.0.1
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 0%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

location and category name need some padding between them.
It makes the interface look a little jumbled. I think there should just be a spacing of some type between the fields.

Attached screenshot showing rendering in question, on firefox.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Paul Mattal (paul)
Friday, 22 April 2005, 04:44 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Comment by Paul Mattal (paul) - Friday, 15 April 2005, 15:27 GMT
Wow, that sucks! Mine totally looks better than that, in Firefox 1.0.2 on Linux.

What version of Firefox and what OS? It looks like we might need to tweak the HTML slightly.
Comment by eliott (cactus) - Friday, 15 April 2005, 16:41 GMT
Linux, Firefox 1.0.2.

What resulution do you run at? I run at 1024x768. If you are using css font sizes and spacing based on static px instead of pt or em, then it will scale differently. That is the only thing I can think of offhand.
Comment by Simo Leone (neotuli) - Saturday, 16 April 2005, 01:05 GMT
This is the same issue for me as well.
Firefox 1.0.2 - resolution 1280x1024

Tested a little, this only occurs when package descriptions are too long to fit on one line.

I played with the left-padding on classes td.data1 and td.data2, .3em looks to be satisfactory. Patch attached, of course :)
Comment by eliott (cactus) - Saturday, 16 April 2005, 01:37 GMT
Yeah, I snagged the static html from the aur, and made your recommended changes Simo. Much better. It puts a space in between the fields so they can be discernable.
Added (simo_fix.png) to show how the result looks on my end.
Comment by Simo Leone (neotuli) - Sunday, 17 April 2005, 02:29 GMT
In that case, I'm going to change the status to requires testing, and slate this for 1.0.1 . Oh and assigned it to myself, since I seem to have fixed it.
Comment by Paul Mattal (paul) - Friday, 22 April 2005, 04:05 GMT
I've committed this in svn v153. It will go out in rel 1.0.1.

Loading...