Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#2531 - pacman pkg should depend on cvsup?
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Nikos Kouremenos (zeppelin) - Saturday, 09 April 2005, 13:34 GMT
Opened by Nikos Kouremenos (zeppelin) - Saturday, 09 April 2005, 13:34 GMT
|
Detailspacman pkg ships abs which wants cvsup to run. [it won't crash it will inform the user :D]
shouldn't pacman pkg require cvsup then? |
This task depends upon
Closed by Judd Vinet (judd)
Tuesday, 12 April 2005, 06:58 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: This way is more flexible -- not all pacman users use ABS. Pacman itself does not require cvsup.
Tuesday, 12 April 2005, 06:58 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: This way is more flexible -- not all pacman users use ABS. Pacman itself does not require cvsup.
maybe the one with the devarchertools?
I just ask if this normal. Is it normal for a package to have an extra dependency and just inform the user to install it?
If yes (so pacman pkg is an exception of the whole logic of AL), close this bug
If not, then just leave only pacman in pacman pkg and make the other stuff in another pkg.