Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#25020 - Backdoor in vsftpd 2.3.4
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Leonardo (sud_crow) - Tuesday, 05 July 2011, 07:00 GMT
Last edited by Ionut Biru (wonder) - Tuesday, 05 July 2011, 13:22 GMT
Opened by Leonardo (sud_crow) - Tuesday, 05 July 2011, 07:00 GMT
Last edited by Ionut Biru (wonder) - Tuesday, 05 July 2011, 13:22 GMT
|
DetailsBackdoor in vsftpd 2.3.4
Additional info: * package version(s): 2.3.4 It has been confirmed there was a backdoor in the vsftpd 2.3.4 package source in one of the master sites. Here are the alerts and info: http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Vsftpd-backdoor-discovered-in-source-code-1272310.html http://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.com/2011/07/alert-vsftpd-download-backdoored.html https://security.appspot.com/vsftpd.html |
This task depends upon
Closed by Ionut Biru (wonder)
Tuesday, 05 July 2011, 13:22 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: we are safe
Tuesday, 05 July 2011, 13:22 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: we are safe
Comment by Leonardo (sud_crow) -
Tuesday, 05 July 2011, 07:03 GMT
Note: I don't know if the sources used to build the binary in the Arch repos have this issue, I'm just warning about the issue in the sources because it might affect the binaries.
Comment by Florian Pritz (bluewind) -
Tuesday, 05 July 2011, 07:32 GMT
The only thing that needs fixing is the source URL because the old one doesn't work anymore. The tarball used for building our package was clean.
Comment by Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi (djgera) -
Tuesday, 05 July 2011, 13:21 GMT
- Field changed: Severity (Critical → Very Low)
2ea5d19978710527bb7444d93b67767a is the good ;)