Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#25005 - [liblrdf] patch to build against raptor2
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Hussam Al-Tayeb (hussam) - Sunday, 03 July 2011, 22:10 GMT
Last edited by Giovanni Scafora (giovanni) - Wednesday, 20 July 2011, 18:44 GMT
Opened by Hussam Al-Tayeb (hussam) - Sunday, 03 July 2011, 22:10 GMT
Last edited by Giovanni Scafora (giovanni) - Wednesday, 20 July 2011, 18:44 GMT
|
DetailsCurrently the arch package depends on raptor1. upstream hasn't apparently ported it to raptor2.
I stumbled against http://people.freebsd.org/~gahr/redland.diff I attached the part of the patch that touches the liblrdf bits. I edited it to patch configure.ac instead of configure and removed the makefile.in part and kept the makefile.am part. this means we have to autoreconf -f -i. It's up to you whether to use it or not. namcap confirms the resultant package depends on raptor2 (raptor in extra repo) instead of raptor1. it's also seems to come for the freebsd folks so should be safe. Just thought I'd share :) 
patch-raptor2.diff
(6.8 KiB)
|
This task depends upon
FS#25090FS#25060, but it's not that important.