Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#24825 - [python-paramiko] should be python2-paramiko
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by RogutÄ—s (rogutes) - Wednesday, 22 June 2011, 10:53 GMT
Last edited by Chris Brannon (cmb) - Thursday, 23 June 2011, 12:35 GMT
Opened by RogutÄ—s (rogutes) - Wednesday, 22 June 2011, 10:53 GMT
Last edited by Chris Brannon (cmb) - Thursday, 23 June 2011, 12:35 GMT
|
DetailsShouldn't python-paramiko be called python2-paramiko, like the rest of python2 vs python3 packages?
|
This task depends upon
Closed by Chris Brannon (cmb)
Thursday, 23 June 2011, 12:35 GMT
Reason for closing: Deferred
Additional comments about closing: No. We only need to change the name when upstream starts supporting
python 3. At that point, we'll have python-paramiko (for python 3.x),
along with python2-paramiko.
It isn't a problem at the moment, so I'm marking this task as "deferred".
Thanks for the report.
Thursday, 23 June 2011, 12:35 GMT
Reason for closing: Deferred
Additional comments about closing: No. We only need to change the name when upstream starts supporting
python 3. At that point, we'll have python-paramiko (for python 3.x),
along with python2-paramiko.
It isn't a problem at the moment, so I'm marking this task as "deferred".
Thanks for the report.