FS#24688 - Regression in wireless performance with iwlagn driver (Intel 4965AGN) kernel26-2.6.39-ARCH
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Riwi (MDstr) - Saturday, 11 June 2011, 15:15 GMT
Last edited by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Wednesday, 15 June 2011, 03:21 GMT
Opened by Riwi (MDstr) - Saturday, 11 June 2011, 15:15 GMT
Last edited by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Wednesday, 15 June 2011, 03:21 GMT
|
Details
Description: Prior to upgrade from kernel26-2.6.38-ARCH,
wireless performance was excellent I had a near non existant
Invalid misc value and no Tx excessive retries from the
output of iwconfig.
Post update to 2.6.39 there has been regression in bit rate performance and a large increase in errors : output of iwconfig post 2.6.39 update: wlan0 IEEE 802.11abgn ESSID:"" Mode:Managed Frequency:2.412 GHz Access Point: Bit Rate=24 Mb/s Tx-Power=14 dBm Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off Power Management:off Link Quality=55/70 Signal level=-55 dBm Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0 Tx excessive retries:5 Invalid misc:33419 Missed beacon:0 output of dmesg |grep 4965 : [ 5.842556] iwl4965: Intel(R) Wireless WiFi 4965 driver for Linux, in-tree: [ 5.842578] iwl4965: Copyright(c) 2003-2011 Intel Corporation [ 5.842580] Registering 4965 rate control operations [ 5.842643] iwl4965 0000:03:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 [ 5.842651] iwl4965 0000:03:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 [ 5.842678] iwl4965 0000:03:00.0: Detected Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN, REV=0x4 [ 5.915174] iwl4965 0000:03:00.0: device EEPROM VER=0x36, CALIB=0x5 [ 5.915192] iwl4965 0000:03:00.0: Tunable channels: 11 802.11bg, 13 802.11a channels [ 5.915451] iwl4965 0000:03:00.0: irq 48 for MSI/MSI-X [ 6.017997] iwl4965 0000:03:00.0: loaded firmware version 228.61.2.24 [ 6.401528] ieee80211 phy0: Selected rate control algorithm 'iwl-4965-rs' output of lspci | grep 4965 : 03:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 4965 AG or AGN [Kedron] Network Connection (rev 61) |
This task depends upon
Comment by
Jelle van der Waa (jelly) - Sunday,
12 June 2011, 19:58 GMT
please take it upstream regressions should be reported there.