Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#24643 - [k3b] missing hal dependency
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Thursday, 09 June 2011, 03:10 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Thursday, 09 June 2011, 08:32 GMT
Opened by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Thursday, 09 June 2011, 03:10 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Thursday, 09 June 2011, 08:32 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
k3b depends on hal to find devices. Error message: No optical drive found. K3b did not find any optical device in your system. Solution: Make sure HAL daemon is running, it is used by K3b for finding devices. |
This task depends upon
Comment by Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi (djgera) -
Thursday, 09 June 2011, 04:20 GMT
Looks like you are running KDE (or your desktop enviroment) without a consolekit session. Otherwise should work.
Comment by Jan de Groot (JGC) -
Thursday, 09 June 2011, 05:56 GMT
Now KDE has been ported to udisks, I can't understand any reason for K3b to still use hal for device detection. I guess you're missing dbus in DAEMONS. Starting hal also starts the dbus daemon. Really, you don't need hal.
Comment by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) -
Thursday, 09 June 2011, 06:56 GMT
k3b runs fine without any hal running. Try starting dbus instead.
Comment by Eric Belanger (Snowman) -
Thursday, 09 June 2011, 07:07 GMT
It works with the dbus daemon running. I was supposed to be running the dbus daemon but I probably disabled it by mistake when I removed hal from my system a while ago as I relied on hal to start it. So shouldn't dbus-core be added as a dependency instead?
Comment by Jan de Groot (JGC) -
Thursday, 09 June 2011, 08:31 GMT
It is in the dependency chain and you're responsible for putting it in DAEMONS. Dbus is a requirement for desktop systems these days.