Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#24589 - [ppp] package uses its own scripts rather than from upstream
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Sunday, 05 June 2011, 14:52 GMT
Last edited by Thomas Bächler (brain0) - Thursday, 06 June 2013, 18:47 GMT
Opened by Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Sunday, 05 June 2011, 14:52 GMT
Last edited by Thomas Bächler (brain0) - Thursday, 06 June 2013, 18:47 GMT
|
DetailsSeveral are provided by upstream, but not used in the PKGBUILD. We should be pulling them from $srcdir/$pkgname-$pkgver/scripts rather than providing them ourselves.
Files in question: pon poff plog pon.1 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Thomas Bächler (brain0)
Thursday, 06 June 2013, 18:47 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: ppp 2.4.5-7
Thursday, 06 June 2013, 18:47 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: ppp 2.4.5-7
Comment by Thomas Bächler (brain0) -
Tuesday, 07 June 2011, 09:36 GMT
This PKGBUILD is old. I'll have to review this, but you are probably right.
Comment by Greg (dolby) -
Monday, 15 October 2012, 08:10 GMT
Still valid?
Comment by Thomas Bächler (brain0) -
Monday, 15 October 2012, 09:15 GMT
Hey, yes, I haven't changed this. The pon/poff/plog scripts we provide are crappy, so maybe the ones from ppp are better.
Comment by Dave Reisner (falconindy) -
Monday, 15 October 2012, 09:17 GMT
Pretty sure they're almost identical.