Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#2450 - expect without gui dependencies

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by eliott (cactus) - Friday, 25 March 2005, 04:15 GMT
Last edited by Jason Chu (jason) - Thursday, 15 September 2005, 06:26 GMT
Task Type Feature Request
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To Kevin Piche (kpiche)
Architecture not specified
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 0.7 Wombat
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Curious if there is a reason why 'expect', a command line utility, is being built with gui flags.

For now, I am recompiling on my own, without said flags.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Kevin Piche (kpiche)
Thursday, 27 April 2006, 03:15 GMT
Reason for closing:  Implemented
Additional comments about closing:  Expect and expectk have been separated into expect 5.43.0-3 and expectk 5.43.0-1.
Comment by Paul Mattal (paul) - Tuesday, 05 April 2005, 12:43 GMT
It's built with GUI flags because of expectk, the version if expect with tk support.

Admittedly, I'm not sure if anyone uses expectk. Is the dependency a big problem for you? It may turn out that it's difficult to separate into 2 packages.
Comment by eliott (cactus) - Tuesday, 05 April 2005, 19:40 GMT
Not really, I guess. If it is problematic to package it seperately, then I can just continue building it myself with ABS.
Comment by Paul Mattal (paul) - Tuesday, 05 April 2005, 20:00 GMT
Okay, so we'll leave it up to Jason to decide if it's hard or undesireable to split. If he decides it's okay to split, then we can take a crack at that process.
Comment by eliott (cactus) - Tuesday, 05 April 2005, 20:16 GMT
Sounds good. thanks for your time spend discussing this.
:P
Comment by arjan timmerman (blaasvis) - Sunday, 26 March 2006, 11:35 GMT
kevin what do you think ?
Comment by Kevin Piche (kpiche) - Wednesday, 26 April 2006, 03:53 GMT
The makefile is utter garbage but the package has been split up. Still testing but should be uploaded soon.

Loading...