Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#24423 - /usr/include/c++/4.6.0/bits/stl_function.h
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Alex Chen (ajchen2005) - Tuesday, 24 May 2011, 17:51 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Wednesday, 01 June 2011, 04:42 GMT
Opened by Alex Chen (ajchen2005) - Tuesday, 24 May 2011, 17:51 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Wednesday, 01 June 2011, 04:42 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
There's a mistypo on "explicit" keyword. It's spelled as "expLicit" by accident. Forgot which line number, but I think it's line number 617 or above. Additional info: * package version(s) * config and/or log files etc. Steps to reproduce: Write a small C++ program that includes <iostream> and <fstream>. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Allan McRae (Allan)
Wednesday, 01 June 2011, 04:42 GMT
Reason for closing: Works for me
Additional comments about closing: And no actual details provided...
Wednesday, 01 June 2011, 04:42 GMT
Reason for closing: Works for me
Additional comments about closing: And no actual details provided...
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) -
Tuesday, 24 May 2011, 22:46 GMT
Give some actual error output.
Comment by Thomas Dziedzic (tomd123) -
Wednesday, 25 May 2011, 05:04 GMT
Umm, I just checked and it is 'explicit' and not 'expLicit', there is nothing broken with that line...