Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#24338 - [udev][kernel26] usb device not active on boot
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by WhoTouchaMySpageth! (tuxfusion) - Wednesday, 18 May 2011, 19:06 GMT
Last edited by Tom Gundersen (tomegun) - Friday, 20 May 2011, 20:37 GMT
Opened by WhoTouchaMySpageth! (tuxfusion) - Wednesday, 18 May 2011, 19:06 GMT
Last edited by Tom Gundersen (tomegun) - Friday, 20 May 2011, 20:37 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Latest udev, udev-168-2-x86_64 was said to fix the tmpdevfs bug, but now I have an unactive mouse after boot. I have to replug it to be able to use it Additional info: * package version(s) udev-168-2-x86_64 * config and/or log files etc. What info shall I provide ? dmesg with no active mouse : http://pastebin.com/4qwjDHRB Steps to reproduce: install udev-168-2-x86_64, normal usb output in dmesg -> no mouse after login -> replug, mouse active. downgrade to udev-168-1-x86_64 -> mouse active after boot. dmesg looks the same to me |
This task depends upon
Closed by Tom Gundersen (tomegun)
Friday, 20 May 2011, 20:37 GMT
Reason for closing: None
Additional comments about closing: Maybe it went away by itself, who knows... Reporter can no longer reproduce.
Friday, 20 May 2011, 20:37 GMT
Reason for closing: None
Additional comments about closing: Maybe it went away by itself, who knows... Reporter can no longer reproduce.
Could you try setting udev_log="err" in /etc/udev/udev.conf and try again? Also change rc.sysinit to remove the "--quiet" after "udevadm settle".
Please attach the output of "udevadm info --query=all --name=/dev/input/mouse0" with udev 168-1 (assuming mouse0 is the one missing from 168-2).
quote "Could you try setting udev_log="err" in /etc/udev/udev.conf and try again? Also change rc.sysinit to remove the "--quiet" after "udevadm settle"."
I did that now, question , what output shall I attach now , dmesg ?
dmesg_udev_168_2_with_all_debug : http://pastie.org/private/55vjywfhukyikk7yypyu8a
_ls_of_dev_input_168_2_without_replug : http://pastie.org/private/jolmhbxebaarkss0batza
_udevadm_of_168_2_without_replug : http://pastie.org/private/qcratm8mnwk8q1cqjc8gw ( NULL)
_cat_of_var_log_errors_boot_with_Debug_168_2 : http://pastie.org/private/1vhtitxjwys0fotkzwnkg
-with 168-1
_udevadm_of_168_1: http://pastie.org/private/7ie2tb5wmnucyaxwv7qg (udevadm info --query=all --name=/dev/input/mouse0)
ls /dev/input shows mouse0 , but will check again now ..
What else shall I provide ?
I'm using custom kernel 2.6.38.6 just as a reminder, would have to move around nvidia module to test other orig kernel
Thx for sticking with me hope nothing machine specific
One more thing might it be librazer ? This is a "Razer Deathadder "mouse , which has it's own daemon "razerd" in this package : AUR/razercfg-git, however no updates for last 6 weeks in that git ...
I'm at a bit of a loss to be honest. I cannot imagine why this change would cause your mouse not to be detected at all...
What happens if you do "udevadm trigger --action=add" after booting with udev-168-2? Does the mouse appear? What if you follow it with "udevadm settle"?
I had a look at the AUR package. Is razerd in your MODULES array? Could you give me the output of lsmod in both the working and non-working state. Also, when you replug your mouse, does that make the output of lsmod the same as in the working case?
still investigating , nothing much in the web ...
With udve-170 you should get output in case of errors, this might help. If it does not, you could try setting udev_log=warn or even info, to find out more.
Have you remembered to rebuild your aur package? Could you try without the aur package at all, would the mouse still work? I would like to exclude that package from the equation as I don't have a clue about what it does (and don't want to wade through code unless I absolutely must ;-) ).
I'm closing, please reopen if it resurfaces.