Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#23973 - [rsync] A vulnerability wase discovered and corrected in rsync
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Nicolas Pouillard (np) - Thursday, 28 April 2011, 15:17 GMT
Last edited by Angel Velasquez (angvp) - Thursday, 28 April 2011, 15:28 GMT
Opened by Nicolas Pouillard (np) - Thursday, 28 April 2011, 15:17 GMT
Last edited by Angel Velasquez (angvp) - Thursday, 28 April 2011, 15:28 GMT
|
This task depends upon
Closed by Angel Velasquez (angvp)
Thursday, 28 April 2011, 15:28 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: see the changelog
Thursday, 28 April 2011, 15:28 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: see the changelog
http://samba.anu.edu.au/ftp/rsync/src/rsync-3.0.8-NEWS
Then see this:
- Fixed a data-corruption issue when preserving hard-links without
preserving file ownership, and doing deletions either before or during
the transfer (CVE-2011-1097). This fixes some assert errors in the
hard-linking code, and some potential failed checksums (via -c) that
should have matched.
So there is no bug, if you haven't tried it please don't do a simply copy paste of seclist here.
Thanks.
Next time, try to fill the rest of the fields like (steps to reproduce) in order to solve the things not just "notify" it.