Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Reporting_Bug_Guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#23851 - [polkit] UID for the parent process of pkexec is read from /proc by stat'ing /proc/PID

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Greg (dolby) - Wednesday, 20 April 2011, 08:34 GMT
Last edited by Ionut Biru (wonder) - Sunday, 01 May 2011, 07:33 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Security
Status Closed
Assigned To Jan de Groot (JGC)
Architecture All
Severity Critical
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

"The problem is that the UID for the parent process of pkexec(1) is
read from /proc by stat(2)'ing /proc/PID.

The problem with this is that this returns the effective uid of the process
which can easily be set to 0 by invoking a setuid-root binary such as
/usr/bin/chsh in the parent process of pkexec(1). Instead we are really
interested in the real-user-id.

While there's a check in pkexec.c to avoid this problem (by comparing it to
what we expect the uid to be - namely that of the pkexec.c process itself which
is the uid of the parent process at pkexec-spawn-time), there is still a short
window where an attacker can fool pkexec/polkitd into thinking that the parent
process has uid 0 and is therefore authorized. It's pretty hard to hit this
window - I actually don't know if it can be made to work in practice.

Either way, if exploitable (which I think it is), this bug is a local root
exploit so we should treat it like that. Now that there is no vendor-sec list
anymore, I don't know what it means wrt to embargoing? (so far this issue has
been kept confidential - and the patches fixing this are not yet publicly
available)"

Details here: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/polkit-devel/2011-April/000349.html
This task depends upon

Closed by  Ionut Biru (wonder)
Sunday, 01 May 2011, 07:33 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Comment by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Wednesday, 20 April 2011, 09:49 GMT
Fixed in testing, still working on an update for extra. We're using 0.99 at the moment, patches for 0.96 and 0.101 don't apply to that version. Moving the testing version to extra will pull in glib2 with some side-effects on packages in extra.

Loading...