Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#23481 - [libreoffice-it] should replace openoffice-it
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Giovanni (ksniffer) - Monday, 28 March 2011, 18:04 GMT
Last edited by Stéphane Gaudreault (stephane) - Tuesday, 19 April 2011, 01:46 GMT
Opened by Giovanni (ksniffer) - Monday, 28 March 2011, 18:04 GMT
Last edited by Stéphane Gaudreault (stephane) - Tuesday, 19 April 2011, 01:46 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
I'm not able to update from openoffice to libreoffice using "pacman -Suy". When I reply yes to the package replacement at the end openoffice-base cannot be removed cause of the openoffice-it dependency from openoffice-base ... I don't exactly ho dependency are managed, but maybe libreoffice-it should replace openoffice-it too? So to let "pacman -Suy" have success? I know I can remove all openoffice on my own and then install libreoffice but in this way I lose pacman automatic features. Additional info: * package version(s) * config and/or log files etc. Steps to reproduce: try to "pacman -Suy" if you have openoffice-base and openoffice-it installed. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Stéphane Gaudreault (stephane)
Tuesday, 19 April 2011, 01:46 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: I am uploading libreoffice-i18n-3.3.2-3 in [testing] (it may take some time before it appears on mirrors).
Tuesday, 19 April 2011, 01:46 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: I am uploading libreoffice-i18n-3.3.2-3 in [testing] (it may take some time before it appears on mirrors).
Comment by Giovanni (ksniffer) -
Thursday, 14 April 2011, 07:23 GMT
Is it difficult to fix this or is not the correct way to go on?
Comment by Stéphane Gaudreault (stephane) -
Thursday, 14 April 2011, 14:08 GMT
Neither, the package is under revision and devs are simply discussing about it. A fix will eventually be availlable.