Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#23408 - [ruby] should no longer conflict with rubygems
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Peter Lewis (petelewis) - Wednesday, 23 March 2011, 19:56 GMT
Last edited by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Sunday, 10 April 2011, 19:44 GMT
Opened by Peter Lewis (petelewis) - Wednesday, 23 March 2011, 19:56 GMT
Last edited by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Sunday, 10 April 2011, 19:44 GMT
|
DetailsThe ruby package in [extra] conflicts with "rubygems", since it replaced the old rubygems package. However, now everyone should have moved past this and the only rubygems package in existence is in the AUR (rubygems1.8). It would be nice if ruby could no longer conflict with "rubygems" so that rubygems1.8 can "provide" rubygems and then gem packages can depend on "rubygems" and be satisfied by either ruby or ruby1.8+rubygems1.8.
Note that ruby can/should still provide "rubygems", that isn't a problem. Thanks. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Eric Belanger (Snowman)
Sunday, 10 April 2011, 19:44 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: fixed in trunk
Sunday, 10 April 2011, 19:44 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: fixed in trunk