Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#23224 - [htop] --sort-key doesn't work
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Roman Kosenko (kite) - Thursday, 10 March 2011, 14:45 GMT
Last edited by Angel Velasquez (angvp) - Wednesday, 18 May 2011, 04:44 GMT
Opened by Roman Kosenko (kite) - Thursday, 10 March 2011, 14:45 GMT
Last edited by Angel Velasquez (angvp) - Wednesday, 18 May 2011, 04:44 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
In the version 0.8.3-1 there is a good feature: parameter --sort-key or -s. In the version 0.9-1 it becomes broken - htop prints help instead. Suggested patch is attached. Steps to reproduce: $ htop --sort-key PERCENT_MEM 
htop.c.patch
(0.5 KiB)
|
This task depends upon
Closed by Angel Velasquez (angvp)
Wednesday, 18 May 2011, 04:44 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: Thanks for the patch Roman and sorry for the inconveniences applied on htop-0.9-2
Wednesday, 18 May 2011, 04:44 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: Thanks for the patch Roman and sorry for the inconveniences applied on htop-0.9-2
Did you reported this? it was accepted?
Nothing will come of reporting this issue, moreover - it's already reported several times a long time ago and even with suggested patches.
Are we dealing with this on a case-by-case basis?
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3152252&group_id=108839&atid=651635
You can open this patch and realize what this stupid bug is. This patch isn't rejected - it isn't accepted because developers по-русски похуй.
We are nice people here, please calm down a little bit, or low a little bit your tone.
I remember to have tested this patch the same day that I saw for first time on the bugtracker. I think is silly and yes, it's usable, and certainly fix the problem, but I thought that is more productive to have it upstream instead having us (devs of a linux distro) patching their software anytime they have something broken.
I will apply this, since I know it fix a problem, I've reviewed the code (there are very few lines) and is a secure IMO, hoping that the htop devs will apply it (they didn't denied yet) on the next release .. thanks for your contribution.
Oh, please be kind next time on bugreports there is no need to be harsh.
I think that self-respectful distributive should use only quality software. If it is broken - fix them, use old stable version or don't use at all.