FS#23078 - [NetworkManager] connection sharing broken due to dnsmasq
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Leontius Adhika Pradhana (leonth) - Monday, 28 February 2011, 17:44 GMT
Last edited by Gaetan Bisson (vesath) - Friday, 24 August 2012, 07:33 GMT
Opened by Leontius Adhika Pradhana (leonth) - Monday, 28 February 2011, 17:44 GMT
Last edited by Gaetan Bisson (vesath) - Friday, 24 August 2012, 07:33 GMT
|
Details
Description:
As stated. Related bug report for ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/725041 Package versions: * networkmanager 0.8.3-0.20110113 * dnsmasq 2.57-1 dmesg: Mar 1 01:38:54 leon-laptop NetworkManager[3585]: <info> Executing: /usr/sbin/iptables --table nat --insert POSTROUTING --source 10.42.43.0/255.255.255.0 --destination ! 10.42.43.0/255.255.255.0 --jump MASQUERADE Mar 1 01:38:54 leon-laptop NetworkManager[3585]: <info> Starting dnsmasq... Mar 1 01:38:54 leon-laptop NetworkManager[3585]: <info> (wlan0): device state change: 7 -> 8 (reason 0) Mar 1 01:38:54 leon-laptop NetworkManager[3585]: <info> Activation (wlan0) successful, device activated. Mar 1 01:38:54 leon-laptop NetworkManager[3585]: <info> Activation (wlan0) Stage 5 of 5 (IP Configure Commit) complete. Mar 1 01:38:54 leon-laptop NetworkManager[3585]: <warn> dnsmasq exited with error: Configuration problem (1) Mar 1 01:38:54 leon-laptop NetworkManager[3585]: <info> (wlan0): device state change: 8 -> 9 (reason 18) Mar 1 01:38:54 leon-laptop NetworkManager[3585]: <warn> Activation (wlan0) failed for access point (abc) Mar 1 01:38:54 leon-laptop NetworkManager[3585]: <warn> Activation (wlan0) failed. Steps to reproduce: In network manager, create a new wireless network. Then IPv4 Settings -> Method: Shared to other computers. The wireless network won't connect. |
This task depends upon
current extra/networkmanager 0.8.3-0.20110113 is affected
What would be nice to understand is what is the expected behaviour, since "Shared to other computers" isn't seem mutually exclusive with the other options.
Wouldn't it be better if the user interface had a checkbox for that?