FS#22875 - Polkit org.gnome.cpufreqselector.pkla config file to be added by default
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Angelo Platti (berseker) - Sunday, 13 February 2011, 07:56 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Saturday, 28 April 2012, 10:39 GMT
Opened by Angelo Platti (berseker) - Sunday, 13 February 2011, 07:56 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Saturday, 28 April 2012, 10:39 GMT
|
Details
Description:
In order to use cpufreq selector applet under GNOME, every user is supposed to do this https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Cpufreq#Privilege_Granting_Under_Gnome I think that this file should be provided by default by polkit-gnome package for example, configured in a way that if the user has been added to the classic "power" group (by following the first steps of configuration of an Archlinux system just after the first installation), He can use this applet without the need of root password, and obviously without the need to manually edit this file (current year is 2011, not 1911). Thank you |
This task depends upon
Closed by Allan McRae (Allan)
Saturday, 28 April 2012, 10:39 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: See final comment
Saturday, 28 April 2012, 10:39 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: See final comment
FS#21029somebody asked the same think for mouting internal partition without root password being asked.he added in aur his rules. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42669
you can ask him to include yours too
Please tell me, I am the only one thinking that in 2011 a desktop user must not be obliged to go searching in the wiki or in the AUR for solving a *basic* problem with a desktop environment designed to be simple to use (like GNOME in my case)?
Why this simple rules are not directly inserted in the package that provide the policykit system, so that everyone have to simply add their usernames to the right groups (maybe directly by using a GUI) to have the functionalities they need?
I'm aware of the "do-it-yourself" guidelines of Arch, but in this case (and other cases like this) I think that the only thing an user have to do, after having installed the packages they need, is represented by the only adding the usernames to the right groups, not by editing files written in some *alien* languages and placed in some alien places in the filesystem, or searching for PKGBUILD on AUR that provides
If the problem (as i read in the other bug closed) is that the groups sometimes are too "general", and maybe someone want let an user only mount external storage units and not external, for example, let's simply create more different groups in order to allow a precise indication of what every username is allowed to do in the system.
I hope to have expressed my toughts clearly, sadly my English is not perfect. In the meantime, I'll install that AUR package and I hope that many other users will vote that one and in the future, at least that package will be included in official repositories.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652128
i'm going to close this bug as fixed.