FS#22868 - [xf86-video-ati] artifacts on ati driver 6.14.0 with ColorTiling enabled

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Thomas Wouters (twouters) - Saturday, 12 February 2011, 14:03 GMT
Last edited by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) - Friday, 25 February 2011, 13:07 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Upstream Bugs
Status Closed
Assigned To Andreas Radke (AndyRTR)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:
Since the update of xf86-video-ati, several users have been experiencing artifacts / screen garbling when ColorTiling is enabled.
See https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=113015
The attached patch fixes the issue (see upstream bug report).
It would be nice if this could be packaged (see attached PKGBUILD), though not a necessity.

Upstream bug report:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33929

Additional info:
* xf86-video-ati 6.14.0-1
* xorg-server 1.9.4-1

Steps to reproduce:
Upgrade to these package versions and restart X.
Make sure ColorTiling isn't disabled in X configuration.

If I start scrotwm, it immediately occurs.
In awesomewm I've noticed that it starts when I start urxvt or xterm.
There are some other upstream reported steps to reproduce.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Andrea Scarpino (BaSh)
Friday, 25 February 2011, 13:07 GMT
Reason for closing:  Duplicate
Additional comments about closing:   FS#22801 
Comment by Thomas Wouters (twouters) - Saturday, 12 February 2011, 21:35 GMT
Perhaps I didn't make it clear enough, but this is actualy a bug and a patch for xorg-server, not xf86-video-ati.
Comment by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Sunday, 13 February 2011, 00:06 GMT
CC'ed to the upstream report.

There's 2 fixes available - to disable tiling and the patch for xorg-server. So far I prefer to to leave this up to the users to fix it in one way. I'll apply a patch when it will be pushed to Xorg-server master or 1.9.x branch. So far the patch might break other stuff so I prefer to delay it.
Comment by Thomas Wouters (twouters) - Tuesday, 15 February 2011, 16:17 GMT
Looks like a dupe of #22801

Loading...