Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#22867 - rpm 5.2.1-3 PKGBUILD wrongly defines rpm as being in conflict with rpmextract
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Simon lewis (quietpinguin) - Saturday, 12 February 2011, 13:43 GMT
Last edited by Ionut Biru (wonder) - Saturday, 12 February 2011, 13:50 GMT
Opened by Simon lewis (quietpinguin) - Saturday, 12 February 2011, 13:43 GMT
Last edited by Ionut Biru (wonder) - Saturday, 12 February 2011, 13:50 GMT
|
DetailsThere are no conflicts between rpm and rpmextract - both apps can live side by side - please remove unneccesary conflict from PKGBUILD...
|
This task depends upon
Closed by Ionut Biru (wonder)
Saturday, 12 February 2011, 13:50 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in Unsupported.
rpm is in aur
Saturday, 12 February 2011, 13:50 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in Unsupported.
rpm is in aur
Comment by Ionut Biru (wonder) -
Saturday, 12 February 2011, 13:47 GMT
we don't have rpm in repos and rpmextract doesn't have any conflict defined in PKGBUILD.