FS#22650 - [libreoffice-i18n] Packages found in db, but not in tree

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Saturday, 29 January 2011, 03:47 GMT
Last edited by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Saturday, 29 January 2011, 09:23 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To Andreas Radke (AndyRTR)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:

Both
extra/libreoffice-kid
extra/libreoffice-sc

are in the repo db but are commented out in the PKGBUILD. Shouldn't they be removed from the repo?
This task depends upon

Closed by  Andreas Radke (AndyRTR)
Saturday, 29 January 2011, 09:23 GMT
Reason for closing:  Won't fix
Comment by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Saturday, 29 January 2011, 07:42 GMT
those langpacks were part of former RCs but were dropped in the last one. they might still be useful and will work with current LibO. are we forced to remove them though?
Comment by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Saturday, 29 January 2011, 09:07 GMT
Not really. Apart from complaints from the integrity check script and that they can't be built with abs, it won't cause any harm in keeping them. Technically, we shouldn't do this but I guess we can make an exception here. Feel free to close this.

Ideally, the dbscripts should be improved in order to support split PKGBUILD with different pkgver. That would prevent this problem from happenning.

Loading...