Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#22546 - Smarter backup file printing needed for unreadable files
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Saturday, 22 January 2011, 01:37 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Monday, 24 January 2011, 14:36 GMT
Opened by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Saturday, 22 January 2011, 01:37 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Monday, 24 January 2011, 14:36 GMT
|
Details$ pacman -Qii filesystem
... Backup Files: MODIFIED /etc/fstab MISSING /etc/crypttab MODIFIED /etc/group MODIFIED /etc/hosts MODIFIED /etc/ld.so.conf MODIFIED /etc/passwd MISSING /etc/shadow MISSING /etc/gshadow MODIFIED /etc/resolv.conf Not Modified /etc/motd Not Modified /etc/nsswitch.conf Not Modified /etc/shells Not Modified /etc/host.conf Not Modified /etc/securetty Not Modified /etc/profile Not Modified /etc/issue The three files marked MISSING are not at all missing; we just can't read them since we aren't running as root. We should print something different in this case. Running under sudo obviously works. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Dan McGee (toofishes)
Monday, 24 January 2011, 14:36 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: d16a5ae7ddf358c452
Monday, 24 January 2011, 14:36 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: d16a5ae7ddf358c452
Comment by Xavier (shining) -
Saturday, 22 January 2011, 10:49 GMT
UNREADABLE (needs root?)
Comment by Dan McGee (toofishes) -
Saturday, 22 January 2011, 20:45 GMT
On the ML, most relevant patch: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2011-January/012277.html