Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#22522 - [thunar-archive-plugin] does not work with Xfce 4.8

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Joo Kia (Jookia) - Thursday, 20 January 2011, 04:52 GMT
Last edited by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Sunday, 23 January 2011, 12:11 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To Andreas Radke (AndyRTR)
Architecture All
Severity High
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 4
Private No

Details

Description:
After the upgrade to Xfce 4.8, thunar-archive-plugin does not work. Simply moving the plugin to /usr/lib/thunarx-2 does not work either, suggesting an incompatibility.

Additional info:
Version : 0.2.4-6

$ pacman -Qlq thunar-archive-plugin
/usr/lib/thunarx-1/thunar-archive-plugin.so

Steps to reproduce:
Install thunar-archive-plugin.
Observe how Thunar does not detect it.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Andreas Radke (AndyRTR)
Sunday, 23 January 2011, 12:11 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Comment by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Friday, 21 January 2011, 15:50 GMT
this needs to be fixed upstream.
Comment by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Friday, 21 January 2011, 16:01 GMT
any patch around that applies on the stable release?
Comment by Randy Lutzinger (Gumper) - Sunday, 23 January 2011, 10:11 GMT
Tried latest version. Thunar still doesn't detect the plugin for me. No extract or compress options appear in the context menu.
Comment by Joo Kia (Jookia) - Sunday, 23 January 2011, 10:13 GMT
I don't see thunar-vfs as a needed dependency either.
Comment by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Sunday, 23 January 2011, 12:11 GMT
thunar-archive-plugin 0.2.4-8 seems to work fine here. thunar-vfs is pulled in by the old configure script. no idea if it is needed to archive remote file systems. I'll keep it until a new upstream release changes this. if you can prove that's not needed open a new request.

Loading...