Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#22190 - [kdebase-konqueror] Provide network configuration modules in a separated package
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Jordi Chulia (jorchube) - Wednesday, 22 December 2010, 18:07 GMT
Last edited by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) - Thursday, 29 December 2011, 15:36 GMT
Opened by Jordi Chulia (jorchube) - Wednesday, 22 December 2010, 18:07 GMT
Last edited by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) - Thursday, 29 December 2011, 15:36 GMT
|
DetailsIn KDE, "Proxy" and "Connection preferences" services in System Settings are currently provided by the package kdebase-konqueror, so, if for example, I replace konqueror by another browser, lets say rekonq, these modules are lost (even happens that rekonq is actually expecting to find these modules installed, as can be seen in this preferences).
So, the petition is something similar as what happened with kdebase-keditbookmarks: formerly was part of the konqueror package, but then was splitted to a separate package. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh)
Thursday, 29 December 2011, 15:36 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Additional comments about closing: Ask upstream to be more modular.
Thursday, 29 December 2011, 15:36 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Additional comments about closing: Ask upstream to be more modular.
Comment by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) -
Wednesday, 22 December 2010, 19:07 GMT
Yes I'd like to implement this as we do for the others packages, but those modules aren't in a dedicated folder so this cannot be implemented in an easy way. Maybe we should open a feature request upstream if does not exist yet