Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#20327 - [zim] impossible to insert an equation

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by François (Spip) - Friday, 30 July 2010, 22:01 GMT
Last edited by Thomas Dziedzic (tomd123) - Saturday, 11 December 2010, 19:07 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages
Status Closed
Assigned To Dan Griffiths (Ghost1227)
Thomas Dziedzic (tomd123)
Architecture All
Severity Medium
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 1
Private No

Details

Description:

Equation editor fails with the following message (GUI)

'NoneType' object has no attribute 'basename'

Nothing on stdout nor stdout.


Additional info:
* package version(s)
* config and/or log files etc.

community/zim 0.47-1

Steps to reproduce:
install zim and latex+dvipng
run zim,
edit> preferences > plugins > tick equation editor

insert equation > add a word or a latex equation
validate.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Thomas Dziedzic (tomd123)
Saturday, 11 December 2010, 19:07 GMT
Reason for closing:  Works for me
Additional comments about closing:  works for me, no response
Comment by Laurent Carlier (lordheavy) - Tuesday, 07 September 2010, 14:38 GMT
Does the problem is still here with zim-0.48-2 ?
Comment by François (Spip) - Tuesday, 07 September 2010, 14:50 GMT
Just before 0.48 update, I tried again and it worked.

I think it's a bug in Zim itself.

For the record, when I reported this bug, all dependances (in zim) were marked as "OK", but it was impossible to add an equation.
I installed some other latex stuffs between my first and second try (Kile...) and then it worked fine. So, the zim's detector of dependances seems to be insufficiant. Due to the delay, I don't know what changed exactly, so hard to say what should be added. :(
Comment by Thomas Dziedzic (tomd123) - Sunday, 07 November 2010, 06:10 GMT
status with 0.49?

Loading...