Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#20293 - [scala] 2.8.0-1 is missing sbaz

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by Gregory D. Weber (gdweber) - Wednesday, 28 July 2010, 00:56 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Monday, 09 August 2010, 14:49 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages
Status Closed
Assigned To Sergej Pupykin (sergej)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 1
Private No

Details

Description: The Arch Linux package scala is missing the executable sbaz (/usr/bin/sbaz), although it has a man page for sbaz. (sbaz is the Scala Bazaars, a package manager for Scala software.)

The Arch Linux package 'sbaz' has the missing executable, but is there a good reason to separate it from the scala package?

1. scala-2.8.0.final.tgz downloaded from www.scala-lang.org includes the file
scala-2.8.0.final/bin/sbaz
2. http://www.scala-lang.org/node/36 states that "Every Scala distribution also contains the packaging program sbaz"
3. http://www.lexspoon.org/sbaz/ states that "Standard Scala installations include sbaz."

Steps to reproduce:

# pacman -S scala
$ sbaz
bash: sbaz: command not found
This task depends upon

Closed by  Sergej Pupykin (sergej)
Monday, 09 August 2010, 14:49 GMT
Reason for closing:  Won't fix
Additional comments about closing:  Also I add optdepends=(sbaz) into trunk
Comment by Gregory D. Weber (gdweber) - Wednesday, 28 July 2010, 01:07 GMT
See related bug report:
 FS#20294  - [sbaz] 2.0-1 package description is misleading
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20294
Comment by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Saturday, 07 August 2010, 10:02 GMT
Is scala release schedule synchronized with sbaz and vice versa? If no, I prefer to keep them separated.
Comment by Thomas Dziedzic (tomd123) - Sunday, 08 August 2010, 11:05 GMT
Sbaz is a seperate package now.

Loading...