Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#20204 - [openttd-opensfx] Misrepresents license as GPL whereas is uses CCSP
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Remko Bijker (Rubidium) - Saturday, 17 July 2010, 19:37 GMT
Last edited by Dan Griffiths (Ghost1227) - Thursday, 22 July 2010, 03:39 GMT
Opened by Remko Bijker (Rubidium) - Saturday, 17 July 2010, 19:37 GMT
Last edited by Dan Griffiths (Ghost1227) - Thursday, 22 July 2010, 03:39 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
The package says it is GPL licensed whereas it is (upstream) licensed as Creative Commons Sampling Plus. This license does not compatible with GPL, as such you can't simply "convert" it to GPL Additional info: * openttd-opensfx 0.2.3-1 Steps to reproduce: Open http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/openttd-opensfx/ and see it is licensed GPL. Open http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/opensfx/repository/entry/docs/license.txt and see it is actually licensed CCSP. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Dan Griffiths (Ghost1227)
Thursday, 22 July 2010, 03:39 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: My apologies... not sure why I thought it was GPL. The PKGBUILD has been fixed.
Thursday, 22 July 2010, 03:39 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: My apologies... not sure why I thought it was GPL. The PKGBUILD has been fixed.