Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#19803 - [jgnash] and OpenJDK

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by Jeroen Op 't Eynde (Duologic) - Tuesday, 15 June 2010, 11:24 GMT
Last edited by Thomas Dziedzic (tomd123) - Saturday, 03 July 2010, 03:00 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages
Status Closed
Assigned To Aaron Bull Schaefer (elasticdog)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:
Installing jGnash without an existing Java environment installs OpenJDK by default. post_install() says following:

jGnash is known to not work properly with the OpenJDK 6 Java environment.
Until upstream bugs are fixed, you should install the jre package to use jGnash.

OpenJDK shouldn't install with jGnash if it doesn't work with it. Until upstream is fixed set jre as dependency.

Additional info:
* package version(s)
jgnash 1.12.0-1 from [community]

* config and/or log files etc.
From pacman: http://pastebin.com/TRmE9YVw


Steps to reproduce:
1. Don't have any java runtime installed
2. pacman -S jgnash
This task depends upon

Closed by  Thomas Dziedzic (tomd123)
Saturday, 03 July 2010, 03:00 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  fixed in 2.3.5 and moved to the AUR
Comment by Jeroen Op 't Eynde (Duologic) - Tuesday, 15 June 2010, 11:33 GMT
Small side note about 'signature not available', this can be ignored according this http://www.pubbs.net/archlinux/200907/60369/
Comment by Thomas Dziedzic (tomd123) - Wednesday, 30 June 2010, 23:22 GMT
I just noticed this, is there any reason why jgnash is 1.12.0 while upstream is already at 2.3.5 ?

From their website: "The older 1.x series of jGnash will run on systems that support a minimum of Java 1.4.0."
Comment by Thomas Dziedzic (tomd123) - Thursday, 01 July 2010, 12:42 GMT
I created jgnash 2.3.5 and also changed the depends to jre.

note: I didn't like using the prebuilt jars but that's how the old one did it, source only exists in svn.

Loading...