Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#19563 - Pacman downgrades some packages by itself
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by vnoel (kaouete) - Sunday, 23 May 2010, 09:06 GMT
Last edited by Ionut Biru (wonder) - Sunday, 23 May 2010, 09:56 GMT
Opened by vnoel (kaouete) - Sunday, 23 May 2010, 09:06 GMT
Last edited by Ionut Biru (wonder) - Sunday, 23 May 2010, 09:56 GMT
|
DetailsHi,
I installed packages from the testing repository, then I commented it. Now when I ask pacman for an upgrade (-Su) it proposes me to install a smaller version of one (but not all!) of the packages that was installed from testing: xf86-video-ati 6.13.0-1 is installed, and pacman proposes me to install xf86-video-ati 6.12.192-1 I don't see any reason for that... |
This task depends upon
Comment by Ionut Biru (wonder) -
Sunday, 23 May 2010, 09:56 GMT
that is happening because xf86-video-ati 6.12.192-1 has a force option.