Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#19203 - [libsamplerate] versioned dependencies mess
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Karol Błażewicz (karol) - Wednesday, 21 April 2010, 21:13 GMT
Last edited by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Saturday, 01 May 2010, 02:28 GMT
Opened by Karol Błażewicz (karol) - Wednesday, 21 April 2010, 21:13 GMT
Last edited by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Saturday, 01 May 2010, 02:28 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
I don't mean to be nitpicking, but: libsamplerate 0.1.7-1 needs flac>=1.1.4 and libsndfile - which in turn happens to need (among other things) flac>=1.2.1. libsamplerate flac>=1.1.4 libsndfile flac>=1.2.1 ... Why isn't it libsamplerate <- libsndfile <- flac? I know you can use libsndfile w/o libsamplerate - jack does it - but you can't do it the other way round, so why is flac a dep for libsamplerate? Additional info: Eric Bélanger wrote > flac is not needed. Please open a bug report. > As for the versioned deps, they haven't been updated. Ideally they just should be removed. Steps to reproduce: 'pacman -Qi libsamplerate libsndfile | grep -e Name -e Depends' which will show you Name : libsamplerate Depends On : libsndfile flac>=1.1.4 Name : libsndfile Depends On : alsa-lib flac>=1.2.1 libvorbis or use our toll-free number ... I mean: webUI http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/libsamplerate/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/libsndfile/ |
This task depends upon
Closed by Eric Belanger (Snowman)
Saturday, 01 May 2010, 02:28 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: fixed in svn for libsamplerate.
As for the rest, they'll be fixed when they'll be updated.
Saturday, 01 May 2010, 02:28 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: fixed in svn for libsamplerate.
As for the rest, they'll be fixed when they'll be updated.
pkg name
# dep1
# dep2
...
graveman
# flac>=1.2.0
# sox>=13.0.0
sox
# libsamplerate
# libsndfile
libsamplerate
# flac>=1.1.4
# libsndfile
libsndfile
# flac>=1.2.1
we have flac listed three times and libsndfile twice. Is it an error or a "just-in-case" approach wrt to deendencies?