Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#19046 - [gdal] Apply upstream fix to correct a serious regression with warping big images
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Even Rouault (evenrouault) - Sunday, 11 April 2010, 17:38 GMT
Last edited by Jaroslav Lichtblau (Dragonlord) - Wednesday, 05 May 2010, 17:55 GMT
Opened by Even Rouault (evenrouault) - Sunday, 11 April 2010, 17:38 GMT
Last edited by Jaroslav Lichtblau (Dragonlord) - Wednesday, 05 May 2010, 17:55 GMT
|
DetailsSee upstream bug : http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3458
This is a serious regression introduced during 1.7 development, that will affect warping any sufficiently large image. Wasn't detected by our autotest suite because the test image were small enough, but this will trigger easily with real-life images. I'd strongly advise to apply at least http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/changeset/19010 It would be also good to apply : http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/changeset/19014 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Jaroslav Lichtblau (Dragonlord)
Wednesday, 05 May 2010, 17:55 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: in v1.7.2
Wednesday, 05 May 2010, 17:55 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: in v1.7.2