Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#1902 - Missing /usr/lib/libnetpbm.so
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Matt Gushee (mgushee) - Wednesday, 15 December 2004, 00:54 GMT
Last edited by Dale Blount (dale) - Wednesday, 15 December 2004, 03:11 GMT
Opened by Matt Gushee (mgushee) - Wednesday, 15 December 2004, 00:54 GMT
Last edited by Dale Blount (dale) - Wednesday, 15 December 2004, 03:11 GMT
|
DetailsThe current netpbm package is missing the symlink from libnetpbm.so.10.18 to libnetpbm.so.
|
This task depends upon
[root@lappie ~]# ldconfig -p | grep netpbm
libnetpbm.so.10 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libnetpbm.so.10
Unless it doesn't fix anything that's broken, I don't think a libnetpbm.so -> libnetpbm.so.10 symlink is required.
As for other distros, most of the ones I've worked with have separate runtime and development packages. The development packages almost always install symlinks to <any_library>.so. And Debian unstable, at least, *does* have libnetpbm.so (it's in the libnetpbm10-dev package); Debian stable has the equivalent for netpbm9.