Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#18728 - [ipython 0.10-3] annoying warning with foolscap >= 0.43, link to upstream fix provided

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by Andrzej Giniewicz (Giniu) - Wednesday, 17 March 2010, 20:14 GMT
Last edited by Chris Brannon (cmb) - Sunday, 28 March 2010, 21:48 GMT
Task Type Feature Request
Category Upstream Bugs
Status Closed
Assigned To Chris Brannon (cmb)
Architecture All
Severity Very Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

IPython with Foolscap 0.43 or later outputs lots of warnings like:

2010-03-17 21:03:26+0100 [-] "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/IPython/kernel/enginefc.py:78: DeprecationWarning: Importing class Referenceable1 directly from 'foolscap' is deprecated since Foolscap 0.4.3. Please import foolscap.api.Referenceable instead\n class FCEngineReferenceFromService(Referenceable, object):\n"

this pollutes logs and raises unnecessary confusion when using running ipcluster as background process or from integrated GUI. Fix is already in trunk, will be included in next release, but it would be 5 minutes to include it in this package and get rid of warning without waiting (unknown amount of time) for 0.10.1 or 0.11, depending which will come out sooner. So here is link to fix from trunk:

http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ipython-dev/ipython/trunk/revision/1231 - just patches related to IPython/kernel - it's absolutely harmless to import those, it's trivial fix.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Chris Brannon (cmb)
Sunday, 28 March 2010, 21:48 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  Sorry I took so long to finish this.
Thank you for the patch!
Comment by Chris Brannon (cmb) - Saturday, 20 March 2010, 14:12 GMT
I downloaded the diff from the site that you referenced.
It doesn't apply against 0.10. But maybe I'm doing something wrong; I'll
keep investigating.
Any idea when 0.10.1 or 0.11 is coming?
Comment by Andrzej Giniewicz (Giniu) - Saturday, 20 March 2010, 19:42 GMT
I made version that apply to 0.10, wasn't checking it before, sorry - two files that need change don't need it for 0.10

About dates, I have no idea

Loading...