Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#18726 - [gvim] window title shows "(as superuser)" when not logged in as superuser
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Noah (print) - Wednesday, 17 March 2010, 19:13 GMT
Last edited by Dan Griffiths (Ghost1227) - Thursday, 08 April 2010, 21:07 GMT
Opened by Noah (print) - Wednesday, 17 March 2010, 19:13 GMT
Last edited by Dan Griffiths (Ghost1227) - Thursday, 08 April 2010, 21:07 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
When logged in as normal user, gvim title bar reads as follows: "myfile.txt (~/myfile.txt) - GVIM (as superuser)" This bug has been reported upstream, don't know if it has been fixed: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603240 Additional info: # pacman -Q metacity gvim metacity 2.28.1-1 gvim 7.2.385-1 Steps to reproduce: 1) su non-root-user 2) gvim /tmp/myfile.txt 2) Observe misleading title |
This task depends upon
Closed by Dan Griffiths (Ghost1227)
Thursday, 08 April 2010, 21:07 GMT
Reason for closing: Upstream
Additional comments about closing: Upstream is aware of the bug. As such, we are not patching it. It you want it fixed sooner, harass the upstream devs ;)
Thursday, 08 April 2010, 21:07 GMT
Reason for closing: Upstream
Additional comments about closing: Upstream is aware of the bug. As such, we are not patching it. It you want it fixed sooner, harass the upstream devs ;)
Comment by Dan Griffiths (Ghost1227) -
Wednesday, 17 March 2010, 21:21 GMT
As this is a known bug, and there is an upstream bug open on it, and it doesn't affect usability I am not inclined to attempt to patch it. I think it's better that we wait on upstream to patch it on their own and release an official patch.
Comment by Noah (print) -
Wednesday, 17 March 2010, 21:28 GMT
Works for me. It's disconcerting to see "as superuser," however.