Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#18671 - Pacman -Qu shouldn't list out of date packages in IgnorePkg in /etc/pacman.conf
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by Thomas Dziedzic (tomd123) - Saturday, 13 March 2010, 23:43 GMT
Last edited by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) - Monday, 14 June 2010, 10:53 GMT
Opened by Thomas Dziedzic (tomd123) - Saturday, 13 March 2010, 23:43 GMT
Last edited by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) - Monday, 14 June 2010, 10:53 GMT
|
DetailsSummary and Info:
pacman -Qu should ignore packages that are in IgnorePkg in /etc/pacman.conf The main reason for this is that for scripts that use pacman -Qu to check if your system is up to date or not, if you purposefully have an outdated package, it will show as your whole system being outdated. Steps to Reproduce: Add an outdated package to IgnorePkg and do pacman -Qu |
This task depends upon
Closed by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh)
Monday, 14 June 2010, 10:53 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Additional comments about closing: "Decided this isn't really necessary. Easier to check pacman -Qu > num_ignored rather then implementing this." - user said
Monday, 14 June 2010, 10:53 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Additional comments about closing: "Decided this isn't really necessary. Easier to check pacman -Qu > num_ignored rather then implementing this." - user said
Comment by Dan McGee (toofishes) -
Sunday, 14 March 2010, 22:49 GMT
This is interesting- we use filter() here on the entire list of installed packages, but that can also take a target list as well. Should the upgrade option imply "all packages except those in ignorepkg"? All the rest of our operations don't make this distinction.
Comment by Thomas Dziedzic (tomd123) -
Monday, 15 March 2010, 02:23 GMT
"all packages except those in ignorepkg" <- this is exactly what I was thinking about.