Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#18396 - [chromium] description could be improved
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Leonardo (sud_crow) - Friday, 19 February 2010, 05:50 GMT
Last edited by Dan Griffiths (Ghost1227) - Saturday, 20 February 2010, 00:37 GMT
Opened by Leonardo (sud_crow) - Friday, 19 February 2010, 05:50 GMT
Last edited by Dan Griffiths (Ghost1227) - Saturday, 20 February 2010, 00:37 GMT
|
DetailsThe "chromium" package has the following description:
"An open-source browser project that aims to build a safer, faster, and more stable way for all users to experience the web" I had been using an SVN version of google-chrome-dev from AUR due to the fact that I didnt thought of searching for "chromium" instead of "chrome". It would be nice to include a reference to Google and/or Chrome in the description of Chromium... something along the lines of: "The open-source project behind Google Chrome, a browser that aims to build a safer, faster, and more stable way for all users to experience the web" Just a thought, Regards. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Dan Griffiths (Ghost1227)
Saturday, 20 February 2010, 00:37 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: An updated description has been committed and will be included in future releases.
Saturday, 20 February 2010, 00:37 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: An updated description has been committed and will be included in future releases.
Comment by Pierre Schmitz (Pierre) -
Friday, 19 February 2010, 09:37 GMT
We don't really have permission to use the Google chrome brand here afaik.
Comment by Dan Griffiths (Ghost1227) -
Friday, 19 February 2010, 21:45 GMT
I agree, perhaps it would be better to ask the maintainer of the google-chrome-dev package to annotate there is a version of chromium in official repos
Comment by Dan Griffiths (Ghost1227) -
Saturday, 20 February 2010, 00:28 GMT
After re-reading the request it seems i may have jumped the gun a little... I am currently reviewing the request as well as the Chrome (and Chromium) legal statements. Assuming nothing prevents this (I suspect it won't) I will adjust the description as requested.