Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Reporting_Bug_Guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in Unsupported. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Reporting_Bug_Guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in Unsupported. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#1839 - No dircolors
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Lukas Sabota (punkrockguy318) - Friday, 26 November 2004, 01:12 GMT
Last edited by arjan timmerman (blaasvis) - Sunday, 06 March 2005, 18:14 GMT
Opened by Lukas Sabota (punkrockguy318) - Friday, 26 November 2004, 01:12 GMT
Last edited by arjan timmerman (blaasvis) - Sunday, 06 March 2005, 18:14 GMT
|
DetailsIn most linux distributions, /etc/profile will set the LS_COLORS using dir_colors. Arch does not do this. The default place for colours are /etc/DIR_COLORS and ~/.dir_colors. To make Arch look for these files, something similar to this would need to be added to /etc/profile:
eval `dircolors /etc/DIR_COLORS` eval `dircolors ~/.dir_colors Tests to see if the file is there must be added, I'll leave that up to you. Thank you! 
DIR_COLORS
(2.6 KiB)
|
This task depends upon
Closed by arjan timmerman (blaasvis)
Thursday, 23 March 2006, 07:47 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: i look @ the DIR_COLORS and my console and it works now.
Thursday, 23 March 2006, 07:47 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: i look @ the DIR_COLORS and my console and it works now.
conclusion:
- DIR_COLORS (attached to this bug) should go to coreutils pkg
- /etc/profile should eval ~/.dir_colors and if not existant /etc/DIR_COLORS
Should we just not include a default file but have the logic?