Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#18238 - rebuild of package using ld.so.conf needed after latest filesystem-2010.02-1
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by solsTiCe (zebul666) - Monday, 08 February 2010, 18:47 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Friday, 26 February 2010, 04:41 GMT
Opened by solsTiCe (zebul666) - Monday, 08 February 2010, 18:47 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Friday, 26 February 2010, 04:41 GMT
|
Detailsfilesystem-2010.02-1 use in /etc/ld.so.conf:
include /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*.conf so i guess there is a number of package that previoulsy modified /etc/ld.so.conf that could and should use /etc/ld.so.conf.d by putting a .conf file in that dir instead of modifying ld.so.conf if i had overwritten my ld.so.conf with the .pacnew without seing that, i would have had problem with the package mentionned below. i found it here 3 packages that do so fakeroot fakechroot qt3 |
This task depends upon
why can't you build and put them in [testing] now so that they are migrated at the same time than filesystem package ?
fakeroot 1.14.4-2
done