Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#17728 - [openoffice-base-beta] lacking correct dependencies to work over ssh with X11 forwarding
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by partner55083777 (partner55083777) - Wednesday, 06 January 2010, 22:46 GMT
Last edited by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Friday, 15 January 2010, 05:46 GMT
Opened by partner55083777 (partner55083777) - Wednesday, 06 January 2010, 22:46 GMT
Last edited by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Friday, 15 January 2010, 05:46 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
I don't think extra/openoffice-base-beta has the correct dependencies. I tried installing OOo on a headless server and using it over ssh with X11 forwarding, but it gives the error: "no suitable windowing system found, exiting." I'm not sure exactly what packages or dependencies it needs, so I decided to try to install Firefox, thinking that firefox would probably pull in whatever graphical dependency OpenOffice also needs. Firefox pulled in these dependencies: xulrunner-1.9.1.7-1 startup-notification-0.10-1 nss-3.12.4-2 nspr-4.8.2-1 mozilla-common-1.4-1 mime-types-1.0-2 libidl2-0.8.13-1 gtk2-2.18.5-1 shared-mime-info-0.70-2 pango-1.26.2-1 libthai-0.1.12-1 libdatrie-0.2.2-1 cairo-1.8.8-1 xcb-util-0.3.6-1 pixman-0.16.4-1 libxrandr-1.3.0-1 randrproto-1.3.1-1 libxinerama-1.1-1 xineramaproto-1.2-1 libxdamage-1.1.2-1 damageproto-1.2.0-1 libxcomposite-0.4.1-1 compositeproto-0.4.1-1 atk-1.28.0-1 alsa-lib-1.0.22-1 OpenOffice then worked perfectly with these additional dependencies pulled in by Firefox. I'm willing to do some more work to find out which one of these is needed, but I don't know how, other than just testing each package independently. What should I do? (Using extra/openoffice-base-beta-3.2.0_ooo320_m8-1 and extra/firefox-3.5.7-1) |
This task depends upon
Just wondering, would something like this be considered an error with the package, or a PEBKAC on my part?