Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#17573 - [moonlight] building mono and moonlight together
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Vincent Gibault (VGib) - Monday, 21 December 2009, 20:40 GMT
Last edited by Isenmann Daniel (ise) - Tuesday, 26 January 2010, 12:09 GMT
Opened by Vincent Gibault (VGib) - Monday, 21 December 2009, 20:40 GMT
Last edited by Isenmann Daniel (ise) - Tuesday, 26 January 2010, 12:09 GMT
|
DetailsI post a bug report, as i have been asked in this thread http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=87104
here is the problem: For building moonlight you must use the mono and mono-base tarballs in the same directory, as describe here: http://www.mono-project.com/Moonlight . Following the method, i tried to make a PKGBUILD for moonlight, but i had a problem, because i must make a "make install" which could overrite all my mono's files ( which is impossible, since pacman won't allow me to overwrite this files). The perfect solution would be to build moonlight during the mono building. Could it be possible, as moonlight is still an unmaintained community package. thx. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Isenmann Daniel (ise)
Tuesday, 26 January 2010, 12:09 GMT
Reason for closing: None
Additional comments about closing: As the package was removed, I don't know why, I will close this bug and put a new version into extra.
Tuesday, 26 January 2010, 12:09 GMT
Reason for closing: None
Additional comments about closing: As the package was removed, I don't know why, I will close this bug and put a new version into extra.
Comment by Isenmann Daniel (ise) -
Tuesday, 22 December 2009, 10:08 GMT
I will discuss this with the rest of the Arch developers. I think we should add it to [extra].