FS#17534 - [filesystem] contains file /usr/local/share/man. why??
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Tomas Mudrunka (harvie) - Thursday, 17 December 2009, 10:37 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Saturday, 23 January 2010, 13:00 GMT
Opened by Tomas Mudrunka (harvie) - Thursday, 17 December 2009, 10:37 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Saturday, 23 January 2010, 13:00 GMT
|
Details
Description: Hello, i have some software installed using
make install (outside the pacman db) in /usr/local and it
have manpages, so why new filesystem package is trying to
replace my manpage-directory with file? isn't instaling
something in local breaking arch rules? thx.
sudo LANG=C pacman -S filesystem warning: filesystem-2009.11-1 is up to date -- reinstalling resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... Targets (1): filesystem-2009.11-1 Total Download Size: 0.00 MB Total Installed Size: 0.34 MB Proceed with installation? [Y/n] checking package integrity... (1/1) checking for file conflicts [######################################################] 100% (1/1) upgrading filesystem [######################################################] 100% warning: directory permissions differ on srv/http/ filesystem: 775 package: 755 error: extract: not overwriting dir with file usr/local/share/man error: problem occurred while upgrading filesystem Additional info: * package version(s) filesystem-2009.11-1 Steps to reproduce: pacman -S filesystem |
This task depends upon
$ bsdtar tvf /var/cache/pacman/pkg/filesystem-2009.11-1-any.pkg.tar.gz | grep local/share/man
lrwxrwxrwx 0 root root 0 Nov 1 04:53 usr/local/share/man -> ../man
btw why? man looks to /usr/local/share/man by default so why you just don't keep it vanilla?
So.... "Works for me"?