Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#17397 - [nginx] add webdav support

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by Martin Sandsmark (sandsmark) - Saturday, 05 December 2009, 16:15 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Sunday, 06 December 2009, 21:14 GMT
Task Type Feature Request
Category
Status Closed
Assigned To Sergej Pupykin (sergej)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Would it be possible to get webdav support in nginx?

Basically just add `--with-http_dav_module` to the configure line.

It would be most appreciated, dear maintainers.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Sergej Pupykin (sergej)
Sunday, 06 December 2009, 21:14 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Comment by Laszlo Papp (djszapi) - Sunday, 06 December 2009, 10:35 GMT
Maybe it would be better to build it on your own, because it's not sure others would like to see this feature too, and in that case it isn't an optimized package for them.
Comment by Martin Sandsmark (sandsmark) - Sunday, 06 December 2009, 15:45 GMT
What are the downsides?
Comment by Benjamin Andresen (klapmuetz) - Sunday, 06 December 2009, 15:50 GMT
I would like to see it myself. DAV is a pretty basic functionality that should always be included in a webserver, it's not many steps behind rewrite in the priority list.

This must be done, my fortune 500 job depends on it!
Comment by Laszlo Papp (djszapi) - Sunday, 06 December 2009, 17:35 GMT
Yeah, I've got packages too that I use daily in my jobs, but I do for my own packages in that case, if I find so something is missing from it, because others don't need it.
Comment by Martin Sandsmark (sandsmark) - Sunday, 06 December 2009, 17:57 GMT
Again, what would make it not "optimized"?

Loading...