Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!

FS#16971 - [python-lxml] Stop assuming packages can be converted to -any

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Monday, 02 November 2009, 06:11 GMT
Last edited by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) - Monday, 02 November 2009, 10:35 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Status Closed
Assigned To Andrea Scarpino (BaSh)
Architecture All
Severity High
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No


Come on guys, this is embarrassing. Do you really think something that links against a C library will be architecture-agnostic? This package is completely unusable on x86_64 at the moment.

dmcgee@galway ~
$ ipython
Python 2.6.4 (r264:75706, Oct 27 2009, 06:25:13)
Type "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.

In [1]: from lxml import etree;
ImportError Traceback (most recent call last)

/home/dmcgee/<ipython console> in <module>()

ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/lxml/ wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
This task depends upon

Closed by  Andrea Scarpino (BaSh)
Monday, 02 November 2009, 10:35 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  2.2.3-2
Comment by Feifei Jia (ffjia) - Monday, 02 November 2009, 07:23 GMT
Yep, nagstamon which deps on python-lxml package does't work, after I upgrade python-lxml, x86_64

ffjia@southpark (~) -> nagstamon

/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/lxml/ wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32

Could not load lxml.etree, lxml.objectify and lxml.html.clean, maybe you need to install python lxml.

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/nagstamon/nagstamon", line 30, in <module>
from Nagstamon import nagstamonConfig, nagstamonGUI, nagstamonActions
ImportError: No module named Nagstamon
Comment by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) - Monday, 02 November 2009, 10:35 GMT
you are right. I didn't see gcc lines during build.