Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#16903 - Mark package as installed from source.
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by Mate Horvath (blo) - Thursday, 29 October 2009, 11:45 GMT
Last edited by Xavier (shining) - Monday, 09 November 2009, 19:44 GMT
Opened by Mate Horvath (blo) - Thursday, 29 October 2009, 11:45 GMT
Last edited by Xavier (shining) - Monday, 09 November 2009, 19:44 GMT
|
DetailsSummary and Info:
I would like to see a feature to mark packages as installed from source. A simple config option in pacman.conf where the user can specify package names (like mplayer, opera etc.). Yes I can use ABS to build packages but sometimes it is easier to install from source and I think this feature is trivial to implement. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Xavier (shining)
Monday, 09 November 2009, 19:44 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Additional comments about closing: this should not and will not be implemented , see comments
Monday, 09 November 2009, 19:44 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Additional comments about closing: this should not and will not be implemented , see comments
The package name is a TINY part of all the information you would have to provide.
"impossible" to implement would be much more accurate than "trivial".
Anyway I hope it is not what you had in mind either.
I meant this:
If I build mplayer from git with a script and install it from source then I just add mplayer (or the desired package name that I installed from source and I want pacman to recognize it as installed) to pacman.conf's dedicated section (well you name it) and it will recognize mplayer as installed. So if I would like to install an app that require mplayer then pacman won't download the package named mplayer as it is already installed from source.
Summary:
Installedfromsource=packages
If you don't care about the wrong part, you are free to automate the creation of a dummy pkg. Actually someone might have already done something like this, I believe I have already seen it somewhere. [1]
So it will do what you want, without implementing ugly feature in pacman :)
Edit :
[1] http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628890#p628890
We will never recommend and support that anyway.
I am still not sure why you insist not using makepkg/pacman. Writing a git pkgbuild is easy :
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28623
That said, there are some special cases where I personally find using pkgbuild/makepkg inconvenient, but that's my problem, and I don't want or need to fake pacman about it.