Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#16828 - Pacman failon checking package dependency
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by Laurent Carlier (lordheavy) - Saturday, 24 October 2009, 21:40 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Sunday, 25 October 2009, 04:21 GMT
Opened by Laurent Carlier (lordheavy) - Saturday, 24 October 2009, 21:40 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Sunday, 25 October 2009, 04:21 GMT
|
DetailsSummary and Info:
I've upgrade xorg stack with testing packages, now package fail upgrading on dependency failure, but the package is instaled ! Steps to Reproduce: Install xorg/dri stuff from testing then: [lordh@maison ~]$ LANG=C sudo pacman -Syu :: Synchronizing package databases... core is up to date extra is up to date testing is up to date community is up to date archlinuxfr is up to date :: Starting full system upgrade... warning: ati-dri: local (7.6-2) is newer than extra (7.5.1-2) warning: binutils: local (2.20-1) is newer than core (2.19.1-5) warning: fixesproto: local (4.1.1-1) is newer than extra (4.0-3) warning: gcc: local (4.4.2-1) is newer than core (4.4.1-1) warning: gcc-libs: local (4.4.2-1) is newer than core (4.4.1-1) warning: glibc: local (2.10.1-5) is newer than core (2.10.1-4) warning: inputproto: local (2.0-1) is newer than extra (1.5.1-2) warning: kaffeine: local (1.0pre2-1) is newer than extra (0.8.8-1) warning: kernel-headers: local (2.6.31.4-1) is newer than core (2.6.30.5-1) warning: ktorrent: local (3.3beta1-1) is newer than extra (3.2.4-1) warning: libdrm: local (2.4.15-1) is newer than extra (2.4.13-1) warning: libgl: local (7.6-2) is newer than extra (7.5.1-2) warning: libx11: local (1.3-1) is newer than extra (1.2.2-1) warning: libxdamage: local (1.1.2-1) is newer than extra (1.1.1-2) warning: libxext: local (1.1-1) is newer than extra (1.0.5-2) warning: libxfixes: local (4.0.4-1) is newer than extra (4.0.3-2) warning: libxfont: local (1.4.1-1) is newer than extra (1.4.0-1) warning: libxfontcache: local (1.0.5-1) is newer than extra (1.0.4-2) warning: libxt: local (1.0.7-1) is newer than extra (1.0.6-1) warning: libxtst: local (1.1.0-1) is newer than extra (1.0.3-2) warning: libxv: local (1.0.5-1) is newer than extra (1.0.4-1) warning: libxxf86misc: local (1.0.2-1) is newer than extra (1.0.1-2) warning: libxxf86vm: local (1.1.0-1) is newer than extra (1.0.99.1-1) warning: mesa: local (7.6-2) is newer than extra (7.5.1-2) warning: xextproto: local (7.1.1-1) is newer than extra (7.0.5-1) warning: xf86-input-evdev: local (2.3.0-1) is newer than extra (2.2.5-1) warning: xf86-video-ati: local (6.12.99.git20091014-1) is newer than extra (6.12.4-1) warning: xf86-video-radeonhd: local (1.3.0-1) is newer than extra (1.2.5-1) warning: xf86-video-vesa: local (2.2.1-1) is newer than extra (2.2.0-1) warning: xorg-apps: local (7.5-2) is newer than extra (7.5-1.1) warning: xorg-font-utils: local (7.5-1) is newer than extra (7.4-3) warning: xorg-server: local (1.7.0.902-1) is newer than extra (1.6.3.901-1) warning: xorg-utils: local (7.5-1) is newer than extra (7.4-4) warning: xorg-xkb-utils: local (7.5-1) is newer than extra (7.4-2) resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) :: libxtst: requires libxi>=1.3 [lordh@maison ~]$ LANG=C pacman -Q libxtst libxi libxtst 1.1.0-1 libxi 1.3-1 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Allan McRae (Allan)
Sunday, 25 October 2009, 04:21 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: [testing] is designed to be above [core]/[extra] in pacman.conf. Feel free to open a bug about the unneed force flag in libxi
Sunday, 25 October 2009, 04:21 GMT
Reason for closing: Not a bug
Additional comments about closing: [testing] is designed to be above [core]/[extra] in pacman.conf. Feel free to open a bug about the unneed force flag in libxi
For these reasons, it is definitely no pacman bug.
[1] http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/libxi/repos/extra-i686/PKGBUILD
[2] http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Official_Repositories#.5Btesting.5D
For instance, when I bumped the libxi flag myself, pacman wanted to restore the repo version all the time on -Su, and I had to put libxi in IgnorePkg.
So maybe this could be re-assigned as a libxi bug ?