Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#16610 - [xmms2] xmms2.install file too verbose, even superfluous
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by quantax (quantax) - Tuesday, 13 October 2009, 10:04 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Wednesday, 14 October 2009, 07:05 GMT
Opened by quantax (quantax) - Tuesday, 13 October 2009, 10:04 GMT
Last edited by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Wednesday, 14 October 2009, 07:05 GMT
|
DetailsThe install file of xmms2-0.6DrMattDestruction-8 is unnecessarily verbose, even superfluous.
> pre_install() { > echo "-- DO NOT FORGET edit /etc/conf.d/xmms2.conf!" > /bin/true > } You don't have to edit it if you are running xmms2 as a user. This is much more convenient as the client automatically starts and stops the daemon. Even if you run the daemon as a separate user one usually knows where to look for the configuration of the rc script. > post_install() { > cat << EOF > ==> NOT included depencies(with reasons): > [...] > Plugin installation: > ---- > [...] Since In order not to clutter the pacman output with unnecessary output I suggest removing xmms2.install completely from the package. If a user needs more detailed info on the installation or the software the wiki is usually a better place for it. I hope this does not sounds too harsh. I just want to keep the package clean. And thanks for taking care of xmms2. :) |
This task depends upon