FS#16511 - [aspell] rebuild aspell-ru with «ё» letter support.

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Vitaly Dolgov (Ferhiord) - Thursday, 08 October 2009, 06:04 GMT
Last edited by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) - Saturday, 15 January 2011, 15:12 GMT
Task Type Feature Request
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To Roman Kyrylych (Romashka)
Dan Griffiths (Ghost1227)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 7
Private No

Details

This is a request from russian community. For a long time the «ё» letter (read it as «yo» without long «u» at the end) was ignoring in our written language. Now we live in Russia not in USSR and there is the demand to write this letter in law.. nevertheless aspell-ru was built without support, so, for example, the word «ёжик» is mistaken :( We love and take pride in it... please, «return» :)
This task depends upon

Closed by  Andrea Scarpino (BaSh)
Saturday, 15 January 2011, 15:12 GMT
Reason for closing:  No response
Additional comments about closing:  1 year old
Comment by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Thursday, 08 October 2009, 08:48 GMT
Do you have any instructions how to build it with "ё" support?
Comment by Igor (cheer) - Thursday, 08 October 2009, 10:13 GMT
I found this link http://scon155.phys.msu.su/~swan/orthography.html
And there is a package in ALTLinux project, http://sisyphus.ru/ru/srpm/Sisyphus/ispell-ru-lebedev
Comment by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Thursday, 08 October 2009, 12:03 GMT
There is a problem:
as per  FS#6047  it is planned to have all aspell packages built from one PKGBUILD (using split packages feature), with sources pulled from aspell.net,
this means that aspell-ru will be built from the official tarball,
so I have two suggestions here:
1) force aspell.net to update Russian package for "ё" support
2) create a separate package, e.g. aspell-ru-lebedev taken from the links above
#1 should definitely be done but in the mean time #2 is the way to go.
Comment by Paul Mattal (paul) - Saturday, 06 March 2010, 21:33 GMT
Any update on this? Should we do the suggested #2 for now, and also send a report for #1 upstream?
Comment by Thomas Dziedzic (tomd123) - Tuesday, 06 July 2010, 14:06 GMT
has anyone reported this upstream yet? link? status?

Loading...