Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#16089 - [ppl] Add SWI Prolog support
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Israel Herraiz (herraiz) - Monday, 07 September 2009, 23:36 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Wednesday, 09 September 2009, 13:06 GMT
Opened by Israel Herraiz (herraiz) - Monday, 07 September 2009, 23:36 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Wednesday, 09 September 2009, 13:06 GMT
|
DetailsDescription: PPL is not compiled with SWI Prolog support
Compiling PPL with SWI Prolog support would be desirable because some Prolog applications use the PPL library. If the bundled version of PPL is not compile with this option, users will have to install the upstream sources instead of this package. Additional info: * package version(s): 0.10.2 * I am attaching a patch for the PKGBUILD file. It has been tested on ArchLinux i686. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Allan McRae (Allan)
Wednesday, 09 September 2009, 13:06 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Additional comments about closing: see final comment
Wednesday, 09 September 2009, 13:06 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Additional comments about closing: see final comment
PKGBUILD.patch
It could be added as an optdepends but given the AUR package "ppl-swi-prolog-interface-cvs" (which seems to the only package with swi-prolog support for ppl) has no votes or packages requiring it, I see no demand for this support and I will not be implementing it at this stage.
In the other hand, that AUR package is completely outdated, it even depends on a package that does not exist (parma-polyhedra-library). But I guess that it will be easier to add my own package to the AUR. Anyway, I would prefer this support to be directly included in the PPL package.