Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#16018 - packages found in database but not in ABS

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by Xavier (shining) - Saturday, 05 September 2009, 10:05 GMT
Last edited by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Tuesday, 08 September 2009, 16:49 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category
Status Closed
Assigned To Eric Belanger (Snowman)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

* community/png2ico
* community/auctex : Eric Bélanger

The corresponding maintainers should either remove them from the db or add the PKGBUILD to svn :)
This task depends upon

Closed by  Eric Belanger (Snowman)
Tuesday, 08 September 2009, 16:49 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Comment by Ionut Biru (wonder) - Saturday, 05 September 2009, 10:17 GMT
urlgrabber fixed
Comment by Xavier (shining) - Tuesday, 08 September 2009, 06:43 GMT
add auctex to the list :

community/auctex : Eric Bélanger
community/klogwatch : Sergej Pupykin
community/png2ico : dtw ? orphan ?
Comment by Sergej Pupykin (sergej) - Tuesday, 08 September 2009, 10:12 GMT
klogwatch fixed
Comment by Ionut Biru (wonder) - Tuesday, 08 September 2009, 10:47 GMT
what's wrong with auctex?
Comment by Xavier (shining) - Tuesday, 08 September 2009, 10:52 GMT
Please give me the link to the pkgbuild if you have it.
I cannot find it neither in ABS nor in viewvc :
http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/auctex/

Same with png2ico (and this one is worse because it's orphaned)
Comment by Ionut Biru (wonder) - Tuesday, 08 September 2009, 12:10 GMT
fix png2ico. the only that remains is auctex
Comment by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Tuesday, 08 September 2009, 16:49 GMT
auctex is fixed. I don't know why it was removed from svn. Probably an error happened when switching to the any arch. Anyway, I've readded it.

Loading...